=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <balazs.k...@ericsson.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132...@github.com>
================ @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +//===--- MisleadingSetterOfReferenceCheck.cpp - clang-tidy-----------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "MisleadingSetterOfReferenceCheck.h" +#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::bugprone { + +void MisleadingSetterOfReferenceCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) { + auto RefField = + fieldDecl(unless(isPublic()), + hasType(referenceType(pointee(equalsBoundNode("type"))))) + .bind("member"); + auto AssignLHS = + memberExpr(hasObjectExpression(cxxThisExpr()), member(RefField)); + auto DerefOperand = expr(ignoringParenImpCasts( + declRefExpr(to(parmVarDecl(equalsBoundNode("parm")))))); + auto AssignRHS = expr(ignoringParenImpCasts( + unaryOperator(hasOperatorName("*"), hasUnaryOperand(DerefOperand)))); + + auto BinaryOpAssign = binaryOperator(hasOperatorName("="), hasLHS(AssignLHS), + hasRHS(AssignRHS)); + auto CXXOperatorCallAssign = cxxOperatorCallExpr( + hasOverloadedOperatorName("="), hasLHS(AssignLHS), hasRHS(AssignRHS)); + + auto SetBody = + compoundStmt(statementCountIs(1), + anyOf(has(BinaryOpAssign), has(CXXOperatorCallAssign))); + auto BadSetFunction = + cxxMethodDecl(parameterCountIs(1), isPublic(), ---------------- vbvictor wrote: I'm more in favor of removing any visibility. Even if public API is OK, maybe the class author made a mistake in internal realization and now there is actually a bug. I think we should check for that as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132242 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
