================
@@ -6,42 +6,42 @@ bugprone-misleading-setter-of-reference
 Finds setter-like member functions that take a pointer parameter and set a
 (non-const) reference member of the same class with the pointed value.
 
+The checker detects public member functions that have a single parameter (which
+is a pointer) and contain a single (maybe overloaded) assignment operator call.
+The assignment should set a member variable with the dereference of the
+parameter pointer. The member variable can have any visibility.
+
 The fact that a setter function takes a pointer might cause the belief that an
 internal reference (if it would be a pointer) is changed instead of the
 pointed-to (or referenced) value.
 
-Only member functions are detected which have a single parameter and contain a
-single (maybe overloaded) assignment operator call. The changed member variable
-must be private (or protected) for the checker to detect the fault (a public
-member can be changed anyway without a set function).
-
 Example:
 
 .. code-block:: c++
 
-  class Widget {
-    int& ref_;  // non-const reference member
+  class MyClass {
+    int &InternalRef;  // non-const reference member
   public:
-    Widget(int &value) : ref_(value) {}
+    MyClass(int &Value) : InternalRef(Value) {}
 
-    // Warning: Potentially dangerous setter that could lead to unintended 
behaviour
-    void setRef(int *ptr) {
-        ref_ = *ptr;  // This assigns to the referenced value, not changing 
what ref_ references
+    // Warning: This setter could lead to unintended behaviour.
+    void setRef(int *Value) {
+      InternalRef = *Value;  // This assigns to the referenced value, not 
changing what ref_ references.
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:

The comment still uses the old name `ref_`, please update it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132242
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to