================
@@ -4169,11 +4169,16 @@ static Value *emitPointerArithmetic(CodeGenFunction
&CGF,
// The index is not pointer-sized.
// The pointer type is not byte-sized.
//
- if (BinaryOperator::isNullPointerArithmeticExtension(CGF.getContext(),
- op.Opcode,
- expr->getLHS(),
- expr->getRHS()))
- return CGF.Builder.CreateIntToPtr(index, pointer->getType());
+ // Note that we do not suppress the pointer overflow check in this case.
+ if (!CGF.SanOpts.has(SanitizerKind::PointerOverflow) &&
+ BinaryOperator::isNullPointerArithmeticExtension(
+ CGF.getContext(), op.Opcode, expr->getLHS(), expr->getRHS())) {
+ // isUnderlyingBasePointerConstantNull returns true does not indicate that
+ // the base pointer is null.
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
In this context, I don't think we need the MemberExpr recursion? Nobody is
going to write `(&((struct S*)0)->y) + i`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137849
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
