ReticulateSplines wrote:
Fly-by comment: I drafted the following alternative comment in another thread.
Please feel free to disregard as I don't know the tone and style of comments in
these files. (But I appreciate your consideration for the contents in the
message I'd like to see!)
// We currently treat deprecated constants as if they don't exist;
// however, note that this current behavior leads to compile-time
// false negatives for coverage checking of switch statements. If
// a switch is missing a case for a deprecated constant, we will not
// emit a diagnostic, even though the deprecated constant might still
// be present in legacy use.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138562
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
