================ @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +//===--- UseEnumClassCheck.cpp - clang-tidy -------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "UseEnumClassCheck.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::modernize { + +void UseEnumClassCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) { + Finder->addMatcher( + traverse(TK_AsIs, + enumDecl(unless(isScoped()), unless(hasParent(recordDecl())))) ---------------- aaronpuchert wrote:
An option sounds good to me. There are two aspects of `enum class` that make it interesting: one is the conversion aspect and another is the scope. I guess the guidelines don't mention the scope because prior to C++11 you could wrap an enumeration in a record type, as it is allowed here. For those that mainly care about the scope, the option seems like a better way than an entirely different check. (Not even considering the question where we might put that.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138282 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
