mstorsjo wrote:

Offhand, I don't quite know here. Which configurations is this about? For 
mingw, the only cases I'm familiar with is building with 
`LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON`, which iirc implicitly enables a corresponding one 
for Clang too. Not sure which of the local variables here that maps to without 
trying and tracing it.

Building that kind of dylib used to work with GCC, but these days it probably 
hits the limit on the number of exported symbols (initially in libLLVM-*.dll), 
unless you reduce the number of enabled targets a lot.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138351
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to