arsenm wrote: > There's some existing builtin stuff going on in this area, e.g. > [96e94b5](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96e94b5662c613fd80f712080751076254a73524)
That's different, the direct buffer usage is still useful, probably. > I'm leaning slightly towards an automatic conversion between the two forms > within LLVM not being worth the hassle. Inclined to abandon this PR, looks > like it doesn't make sense within the wider context, but will leave it open > for a while in case people comment further. It does, we should have a consistent set of buffer builtins https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137678 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits