arsenm wrote:

> There's some existing builtin stuff going on in this area, e.g. 
> [96e94b5](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96e94b5662c613fd80f712080751076254a73524)

That's different, the direct buffer usage is still useful, probably.

> I'm leaning slightly towards an automatic conversion between the two forms 
> within LLVM not being worth the hassle. Inclined to abandon this PR, looks 
> like it doesn't make sense within the wider context, but will leave it open 
> for a while in case people comment further.

It does, we should have a consistent set of buffer builtins 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137678
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to