alexfh wrote:
This commit changed the behavior of the following code
(https://godbolt.org/z/r1q55e1jv / https://godbolt.org/z/GsPqxaf3G):
```
#include <vector>
constexpr unsigned long num = 123;
void foo() {
// OK
(void)std::vector<unsigned long>({num});
// Fail
(void)std::vector<long>({num});
}
```
In the second case Clang choses a different vector constructor. See also
https://godbolt.org/z/ecWo4E6z4.
Is this change in the behavior expected?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136203
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
