mati865 wrote:

> These changes mostly look good to me, but it all feels a bit unclear to me 
> still. So I'd appreciate e.g. one or a few sentences in the commit message on 
> each of these commits, to explain a bit about the why/how and how things work 
> in other preexisting environments.

Sure, I'll do that within the next few days.

> Is this for building LLVM/Clang with GCC, or for building LLVM/Clang with 
> Clang?

Both, initially I started with GCC and then added fixes for building with Clang.

> Then secondly, LLVM only allows "squash and merge" merging of PRs - so all 
> these nicely split changes (with individual explanations soon, I'd hope!) 
> would end up all mushed together. So unfortunately, to preserve the info 
> about each of them, they'd need to be filed in separate individual PRs.

I think the descriptions would be preserved if I combined them all into PR 
description. I've split the commits only to make the review easier.

> Luckily most of these changes don't build on top of each other (even if you 
> might not be able to build things properly unless you have all of them 
> applied at once?), so it should be fairly straightforward to file all those 
> PRs in parallel.

Yeah, this won't build at all without all commits (or most of in case of GCC). 
So, it's not like there is anything to lose.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134494
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to