[clang] [clang][CompundLiteralExpr] Don't defer evaluation for CLEs (PR #137163)

[Eli Friedman via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -4622,7 +4618,12 @@ handleLValueToRValueConversion(EvalInfo &Info, const 
Expr *Conv, QualType Type,
         }
       }
 
-      CompleteObject LitObj(LVal.Base, &Lit, Base->getType());
+      APValue *Lit =
+          CLE->hasStaticStorage()
+              ? &CLE->getStaticValue()
+              : Info.CurrentCall->getTemporary(Base, LVal.Base.getVersion());
+
+      CompleteObject LitObj(LVal.Base, Lit, Base->getType());
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:

If we're evaluating the compound literal eagerly, can we just drop this 
codepath and go use the generic findCompleteObject() codepath instead?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137163
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits