philnik777 wrote:

> > Maybe `-Wkeyword-in-c++` or `-Wc++-keyword` would be a more concise name 
> > for the group?
> 
> I'm not tied to the name I picked, so either of these is fine by me. GCC 
> doesn't split this into its own warning group, so we've got some latitude.
> 
> Any strong preferences?

FWIW I feel like the current one feels quite artificial. I think 
`-Wc++-keyword` is kinda nice, since it feels very similar to `-Wc++-compat`, 
but I don't have strong preferences.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137234
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to