mizvekov wrote: > The main purpose is for these expressions, with templates being just one > possible beneficiary.
Sure, but outside of templates, all forms of type sugar are preserved just fine in the current implementation, so there would be no particular reason to pursue a different builtin type. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136542 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
