================
@@ -4787,8 +4787,10 @@ LinkageInfo
LinkageComputer::computeTypeLinkageInfo(const Type *T) {
return computeTypeLinkageInfo(cast<ReferenceType>(T)->getPointeeType());
case Type::MemberPointer: {
const auto *MPT = cast<MemberPointerType>(T);
- LinkageInfo LV =
- getDeclLinkageAndVisibility(MPT->getMostRecentCXXRecordDecl());
+ LinkageInfo LV;
+ if (CXXRecordDecl *D = MPT->getMostRecentCXXRecordDecl()) {
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
>MemberPointerType seems to be both for data members or functions.
I would expect both of those to have a `CXXRecordDecl`.
>Or I guess it can be neither if is a template parameter? (see test75)
Ok, so that looks like the record decl is null because the 'class' is dependent
(see that `getMostRecentCXXDecl` does `getClass` as part of its implementation).
Should we be taking visibility from that `getClass` in this case? It is a
dependent expression in this case, but perhaps we should be?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136689
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
