AaronBallman wrote: > Putting aside for now the naming issue ([#136038 > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136038#discussion_r2049703902)), > is there anything left for the changes proposed in this PR?
Based on: > ... but I think "will this end up as an i1" is a fair summary. I think this probably should include 1-bit bit-precise integer types in `hasBooleanRepresentation()`, but it may not be critical. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136038 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
