================
@@ -34,21 +34,22 @@ void test_invalid_call_1(int s) {
int some_func2(int a, int b);
void test_invalid_call_2() {
- // CHECK: -RecoveryExpr {{.*}} 'int' contains-errors
+ // CHECK: -RecoveryExpr {{.*}} '<dependent type>' contains-errors
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
> I think we still assert that we can't have a dependent type when we know we
> can evaluate a constraint,
We have some guards in constant evaluator, which prevents it evaluating
RecoveryExprs:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bd4662cd3f3743e08699e6bab976d9e7b163ece0#diff-255a21a02a8966766225831836d482547787baf9a770fbf67178ebb7d7347e27R4832-R4839
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136295
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
