arsenm wrote:

> So may be we can make the check more permissive for now?

Yes, option 1 is use regex on the return attribute. Option 2 is REQUIRES nvptx 
registered target. Option 3 is some other way of making sure NVVMIntrRange 
doesn't run. Something is broken now because it is running at -O0 but it should 
not be. Option 4 is remove NVVMIntrRange and move the conservative maximum 
ranges to the intrinsic declarations like this patch did 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136196
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to