llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Nick Sarnie (sarnex)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

The MSVC STL includes specializations of `_Is_memfunptr` for every function 
pointer type, including every calling convention.

The problem is the AMDGPU target doesn't support the x86 `vectorcall` calling 
convention so clang sets it to the default CC. This ends up clashing with the 
already-existing overload for the default CC, so we get a duplicate definition 
error when including `type_traits` (which we heavily use in the SYCL STL) and 
compiling for AMDGPU on Windows.

This doesn't happen for pure AMDGPU non-SYCL because it doesn't include the C++ 
STL, and it doesn't happen for CUDA/HIP because a similar workaround was done 
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa49c3a888e816969b5ed68cd5c47efc3eb9419f).

I am not an expert in Sema, so I did a kinda of hardcoded fix, please let me 
know if there is a better way to fix this.

As far as I can tell we can't do exactly the same fix that was done for CUDA 
because we can't differentiate between device and host code so easily.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135979.diff


3 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp (+6-1) 
- (added) clang/test/SemaSYCL/Inputs/vectorcall.hpp (+18) 
- (added) clang/test/SemaSYCL/sycl-cconv-win.cpp (+5) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
index bc891fb009410..3594111d86ccc 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
@@ -5492,12 +5492,12 @@ bool Sema::CheckCallingConvAttr(const ParsedAttr 
&Attrs, CallingConv &CC,
 
   TargetInfo::CallingConvCheckResult A = TargetInfo::CCCR_OK;
   const TargetInfo &TI = Context.getTargetInfo();
+  auto *Aux = Context.getAuxTargetInfo();
   // CUDA functions may have host and/or device attributes which indicate
   // their targeted execution environment, therefore the calling convention
   // of functions in CUDA should be checked against the target deduced based
   // on their host/device attributes.
   if (LangOpts.CUDA) {
-    auto *Aux = Context.getAuxTargetInfo();
     assert(FD || CFT != CUDAFunctionTarget::InvalidTarget);
     auto CudaTarget = FD ? CUDA().IdentifyTarget(FD) : CFT;
     bool CheckHost = false, CheckDevice = false;
@@ -5522,6 +5522,11 @@ bool Sema::CheckCallingConvAttr(const ParsedAttr &Attrs, 
CallingConv &CC,
       A = HostTI->checkCallingConvention(CC);
     if (A == TargetInfo::CCCR_OK && CheckDevice && DeviceTI)
       A = DeviceTI->checkCallingConvention(CC);
+  } else if (LangOpts.SYCLIsDevice && TI.getTriple().isAMDGPU() &&
+             CC == CC_X86VectorCall) {
+    A = TI.checkCallingConvention(CC);
+    if (Aux && A != TargetInfo::CCCR_OK)
+      A = Aux->checkCallingConvention(CC);
   } else {
     A = TI.checkCallingConvention(CC);
   }
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaSYCL/Inputs/vectorcall.hpp 
b/clang/test/SemaSYCL/Inputs/vectorcall.hpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..566a48dd24c30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaSYCL/Inputs/vectorcall.hpp
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+template <typename F> struct A{};
+
+template <typename Ret, typename C, typename... Args> struct A<Ret (           
  C::*)(Args...) noexcept> { static constexpr int value = 0; };
+template <typename Ret, typename C, typename... Args> struct A<Ret 
(__vectorcall C::*)(Args...) noexcept> { static constexpr int value = 1; };
+
+template <typename F> constexpr int A_v = A<F>::value;
+
+struct B
+{
+    void f() noexcept {}
+    void __vectorcall g() noexcept {}
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+    return A_v<decltype(&B::f)> + A_v<decltype(&B::g)>;
+}
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaSYCL/sycl-cconv-win.cpp 
b/clang/test/SemaSYCL/sycl-cconv-win.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..f0c22a2ed3921
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaSYCL/sycl-cconv-win.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -isystem %S/Inputs/ -fsycl-is-device -triple amdgcn-amd-hsa 
-aux-triple x86_64-pc-windows-msvc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+#include <vectorcall.hpp>

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135979
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to