Author: Mészáros Gergely
Date: 2025-04-16T08:02:42+02:00
New Revision: f3c77445791b510858561cb424ffa1cd7513250b

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3c77445791b510858561cb424ffa1cd7513250b
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f3c77445791b510858561cb424ffa1cd7513250b.diff

LOG: [Clang][Sema] Fix -Whigher-precision-for-complex-division (#131477)

- Fix false positive when divisor is a real number.
- Fix false negative when divident is real, but divisor is complex.
- Fix false negative when due to promotion the division is performed in
higher precision than the divident.
- Fix false negative in divide and assign (`a /= b`).

Fixes: #131127

---------

Co-authored-by: Zahira Ammarguellat <zahira.ammarguel...@intel.com>

Added: 
    clang/test/Sema/complex-div-warn-higher-precision.cpp

Modified: 
    clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
    clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 84ad253c1ec4f..5af4c08f64cd8 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -371,6 +371,14 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
 
 - An error is now emitted when a ``musttail`` call is made to a function 
marked with the ``not_tail_called`` attribute. (#GH133509).
 
+- ``-Whigher-precisision-for-complex-divison`` warns when:
+
+  -    The divisor is complex.
+  -    When the complex division happens in a higher precision type due to 
arithmetic promotion.
+  -    When using the divide and assign operator (``/=``).
+
+  Fixes #GH131127
+
 Improvements to Clang's time-trace
 ----------------------------------
 

diff  --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index c65b4eadf9c67..6830bb5c01c7d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -10602,6 +10602,45 @@ static void checkArithmeticNull(Sema &S, ExprResult 
&LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
       << LHS.get()->getSourceRange() << RHS.get()->getSourceRange();
 }
 
+static void DetectPrecisionLossInComplexDivision(Sema &S, QualType DivisorTy,
+                                                 SourceLocation OpLoc) {
+  // If the divisor is real, then this is real/real or complex/real division.
+  // Either way there can be no precision loss.
+  auto *CT = DivisorTy->getAs<ComplexType>();
+  if (!CT)
+    return;
+
+  QualType ElementType = CT->getElementType();
+  bool IsComplexRangePromoted = S.getLangOpts().getComplexRange() ==
+                                LangOptions::ComplexRangeKind::CX_Promoted;
+  if (!ElementType->isFloatingType() || !IsComplexRangePromoted)
+    return;
+
+  ASTContext &Ctx = S.getASTContext();
+  QualType HigherElementType = Ctx.GetHigherPrecisionFPType(ElementType);
+  const llvm::fltSemantics &ElementTypeSemantics =
+      Ctx.getFloatTypeSemantics(ElementType);
+  const llvm::fltSemantics &HigherElementTypeSemantics =
+      Ctx.getFloatTypeSemantics(HigherElementType);
+
+  if ((llvm::APFloat::semanticsMaxExponent(ElementTypeSemantics) * 2 + 1 >
+       llvm::APFloat::semanticsMaxExponent(HigherElementTypeSemantics)) ||
+      (HigherElementType == Ctx.LongDoubleTy &&
+       !Ctx.getTargetInfo().hasLongDoubleType())) {
+    // Retain the location of the first use of higher precision type.
+    if (!S.LocationOfExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.isValid())
+      S.LocationOfExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied = OpLoc;
+    for (auto &[Type, Num] : S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied) {
+      if (Type == HigherElementType) {
+        Num++;
+        return;
+      }
+    }
+    S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.push_back(std::make_pair(
+        HigherElementType, S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.size()));
+  }
+}
+
 static void DiagnoseDivisionSizeofPointerOrArray(Sema &S, Expr *LHS, Expr *RHS,
                                           SourceLocation Loc) {
   const auto *LUE = dyn_cast<UnaryExprOrTypeTraitExpr>(LHS);
@@ -10696,6 +10735,7 @@ QualType Sema::CheckMultiplyDivideOperands(ExprResult 
&LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
   if (compType.isNull() || !compType->isArithmeticType())
     return InvalidOperands(Loc, LHS, RHS);
   if (IsDiv) {
+    DetectPrecisionLossInComplexDivision(*this, RHS.get()->getType(), Loc);
     DiagnoseBadDivideOrRemainderValues(*this, LHS, RHS, Loc, IsDiv);
     DiagnoseDivisionSizeofPointerOrArray(*this, LHS.get(), RHS.get(), Loc);
   }
@@ -15347,39 +15387,6 @@ static void DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence(Sema &Self, 
BinaryOperatorKind Opc,
     DiagnoseShiftCompare(Self, OpLoc, LHSExpr, RHSExpr);
 }
 
-static void DetectPrecisionLossInComplexDivision(Sema &S, SourceLocation OpLoc,
-                                                 Expr *Operand) {
-  if (auto *CT = Operand->getType()->getAs<ComplexType>()) {
-    QualType ElementType = CT->getElementType();
-    bool IsComplexRangePromoted = S.getLangOpts().getComplexRange() ==
-                                  LangOptions::ComplexRangeKind::CX_Promoted;
-    if (ElementType->isFloatingType() && IsComplexRangePromoted) {
-      ASTContext &Ctx = S.getASTContext();
-      QualType HigherElementType = Ctx.GetHigherPrecisionFPType(ElementType);
-      const llvm::fltSemantics &ElementTypeSemantics =
-          Ctx.getFloatTypeSemantics(ElementType);
-      const llvm::fltSemantics &HigherElementTypeSemantics =
-          Ctx.getFloatTypeSemantics(HigherElementType);
-      if ((llvm::APFloat::semanticsMaxExponent(ElementTypeSemantics) * 2 + 1 >
-           llvm::APFloat::semanticsMaxExponent(HigherElementTypeSemantics)) ||
-          (HigherElementType == Ctx.LongDoubleTy &&
-           !Ctx.getTargetInfo().hasLongDoubleType())) {
-        // Retain the location of the first use of higher precision type.
-        if (!S.LocationOfExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.isValid())
-          S.LocationOfExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied = OpLoc;
-        for (auto &[Type, Num] : S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied) {
-          if (Type == HigherElementType) {
-            Num++;
-            return;
-          }
-        }
-        S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.push_back(std::make_pair(
-            HigherElementType, S.ExcessPrecisionNotSatisfied.size()));
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-
 ExprResult Sema::ActOnBinOp(Scope *S, SourceLocation TokLoc,
                             tok::TokenKind Kind,
                             Expr *LHSExpr, Expr *RHSExpr) {
@@ -15390,11 +15397,6 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnBinOp(Scope *S, SourceLocation 
TokLoc,
   // Emit warnings for tricky precedence issues, e.g. "bitfield & 0x4 == 0"
   DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence(*this, Opc, TokLoc, LHSExpr, RHSExpr);
 
-  // Emit warnings if the requested higher precision type equal to the current
-  // type precision.
-  if (Kind == tok::TokenKind::slash)
-    DetectPrecisionLossInComplexDivision(*this, TokLoc, LHSExpr);
-
   BuiltinCountedByRefKind K =
       BinaryOperator::isAssignmentOp(Opc) ? AssignmentKind : BinaryExprKind;
 

diff  --git a/clang/test/Sema/complex-div-warn-higher-precision.cpp 
b/clang/test/Sema/complex-div-warn-higher-precision.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..a7cc2fbc7ed21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Sema/complex-div-warn-higher-precision.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-linux -verify=no-diag \
+// RUN: -DDIV_CC -DDIV_RC -DDIVASSIGN -DDIVMIXEDFD -DDIVMIXEDFD2 -DDIVMIXEDID 
-DDIVASSIGN_MIXEDFD
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify=no-diag
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIV_CC
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIV_RC
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIVASSIGN
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIVMIXEDFD
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIVMIXEDFD2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIVMIXEDID
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -complex-range=promoted -fsyntax-only -triple 
x86_64-unknown-windows -verify -DDIVASSIGN_MIXEDFD
+
+_Complex double div_ccf(_Complex float a, _Complex float b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+_Complex double div_cr(_Complex double a, double b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+_Complex double div_cr_mixed1(_Complex double a, float b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+_Complex double div_cr_mixed2(_Complex float a, double b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+_Complex double div_rr(double a, double b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+_Complex int div_ii(_Complex int a, _Complex int b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+struct UserT {
+    friend UserT operator/(UserT, _Complex double);
+    friend UserT operator/(_Complex double, UserT);
+};
+
+UserT div_uc(UserT a, _Complex double b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+UserT div_cu(_Complex double a, UserT b) {
+    return a / b;
+}
+
+#ifdef DIV_CC
+_Complex double div_cc(_Complex double a, const _Complex double b) {
+    return a / b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIV_CC
+
+#ifdef DIV_RC
+_Complex double div_rc(double a, _Complex float b) {
+    return a / b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIV_RC
+
+#ifdef DIVASSIGN
+_Complex double divassign(_Complex double a, _Complex double b) {
+    return a /= b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIVASSIGN
+
+#ifdef DIVMIXEDFD
+_Complex double divmixedfd(_Complex float a, _Complex double b) {
+    return a / b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIVMIXEDFD
+
+#ifdef DIVMIXEDFD2
+_Complex double divmixedfd2(_Complex double a, _Complex float b) {
+    return a / b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIVMIXEDFD2
+
+#ifdef DIVMIXEDID
+_Complex double divmixedid(_Complex int a, _Complex double b) {
+    return a / b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIVMIXEDID
+
+#ifdef DIVASSIGN_MIXEDFD
+_Complex double divassign_mixedfd(_Complex float a, _Complex double b) {
+    return a /= b; // #1
+}
+#endif // DIVMIXEDFD
+
+// no-diag-no-diagnostics
+// expected-warning@#1 {{excess precision is requested but the target does not 
support excess precision which may result in observable 
diff erences in complex division behavior}}


        
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to