michele-scandale wrote:
Given that there are already similar functions in the `Type` class -- e.g.
`has{Signed,Unsigned,}IntegerRepresentation`, `hasFloatingRepresentation` -- it
seems a bit inconsistent the definition of `hasBooleanRepresentation`. I would
expect that "vector of booleans" to have `hasBooleanRepresentation` returning
`true`, and I would expect `_Atomic(<type with boolean representation>)` to
have `hasBooleanRepresentation` returning `false`.
Any thoughts?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134159
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
