AaronBallman wrote: > > I'm confused -- how is there existing code depending on a builtin which > > doesn't yet exist in Clang? Are we copying these builtins from somewhere > > else? > > This is part of the pointer authentication support we are upstreaming, all of > which has been in use for a long time, just not available in upstream > llvm/clang.
Oof. On the one hand, we don't want to break your existing users. On the other hand, we don't want to force the much broader audience of users into a worse interface. Are those uses in your downstream able to use things like fix-its to switch from the reference-based interface to a pointer-based interface? (Basically, is there a transition approach that leads to a better world?) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135469 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
