emaxx-google wrote: > > Here's a new reproducer, this time verifying that a semi-fresh > > tip-of-the-tree doesn't trigger the same error: > > https://pastebin.com/7tYfjazz. Apologies for the delay. > > Thanks. I gave it a try, but I don't see any `use of overloaded operator '=' > is ambiguous` error. In fact, there isn't a `operator =` in the sources at > all. What am I missing? 🤔
I didn't investigate the error - but could it come from autogenerated operators? > Creduce-like tools are very bad at finding reject valid codes. @emaxx-google, > can you paste your interestingness test? Here's the (slightly smaller) input: https://pastebin.com/dBy1T9fc . The simplified script: https://pastebin.com/udVTaPYV . Its output: https://pastebin.com/Mcq0Y0rf . https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
