github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp -- clang-tools-extra/clangd/XRefs.cpp clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CallHierarchyTests.cpp `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/XRefs.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/XRefs.cpp index 54b99c9a6..df814380f 100644 --- a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/XRefs.cpp +++ b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/XRefs.cpp @@ -2426,7 +2426,7 @@ outgoingCalls(const CallHierarchyItem &Item, const SymbolIndex *Index) { } Results.push_back( CallHierarchyOutgoingCall{std::move(*CHI), std::move(FromRanges)}); - } + } }); // Sort results by name of the callee. llvm::sort(Results, [](const CallHierarchyOutgoingCall &A, diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CallHierarchyTests.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CallHierarchyTests.cpp index b9b3325c5..eb852ef5e 100644 --- a/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CallHierarchyTests.cpp +++ b/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CallHierarchyTests.cpp @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ TEST(CallHierarchy, MultiFileCpp) { OutgoingLevel1, // fromRanges are interpreted in the context of Items[0]'s file. // If that's the header, we can't get ranges from the implementation - // file! + // file! ElementsAre( AllOf(to(AllOf(withName("caller1"), withDetail("nsa::caller1"))), IsDeclaration ? oFromRanges() `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134657 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits