ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > Going back to the idea of not writing the paths of imported PCMs at all; > currently the condition to not write the paths is if the imported PCM is a > named module. Perhaps this condition can be extended to omit the paths if the > PCM was found through `-fmodule-file=<name>=<pcm>`?
IIRC, this relates to build systems. While not writing the imported BMI paths in the BMI, the cost is, the build system must provide a full set of `-fmodule-file=<name>=<pcm>` for all directly or indirectly imported modules. This is a convention between named modules and build systems (or cmake, in particular). I think this is not related to `-fmodule-file=<name>=<pcm>` or not. In this way, we need to build a new convention for header units. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135147 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
