usx95 wrote: > > Another thought that crossed my mind is that we are actually heavily > > optimizing for minimization, but use a name that creates an impression we > > might care about something else. I don't have great ideas there, but maybe > > -dump-minimization-hints would be appropriate? Any thoughts on this? > > TBH I would prefer not to do that. Although we're doing this for > minimization, there's nothing particular about the deserialized ranges or the > JSON format that we produce that limits its use to minimization. If someone > else find this useful, I would only welcome that. So in this sense, I'd > prefer not to have a very specific name.
I am in favor of using `-dump-minimization-hints` to scope it down and avoid Hyrum's law. If we want to be more descriptive, we could have this as a `CommaJoined` flag, eg. `-dump-minimization-hints=deserialized-decl-ranges,some-other-future-hint,all`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133910 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
