erichkeane wrote: > I thought CWG's preferred direction on this was to reject entirely?
What do they wish to reject? Defining an enum in a different declaration context than its primary context? That seems odd. Do you have an idea of the CWG DR? We looked but couldn't find anything that looked like it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134998 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
