llvm-beanz wrote: > Given your feedback here it sounds like you want us to drop the template and > allow for implicit vector truncation so that the error will be ambiguous > instead of `call to deleted function 'lit'`?
Yes, let's not add compatibility overloads unless we have driving reasons for them. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
