PiotrZSL wrote:

> I think flattening the configuration items will only reduce readability, 
> because we cannot define a YAML schema for it.
If we put that entire YAML under "custom-call-main-function.Config", that would 
also be fine. Thing is that with this there could be a way to make all chances 
in "custom" module without modify tool core. In such case we could have;
custom-call-main-function.Config and custom-call-main-function.Engine, and in 
such case entire config parsing would be actually inside a check code, and 
creating different base checks could also be possible.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131804
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to