llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

In ecc7e6ce4, we tried to inspect the `LambdaScopeInfo` on stack to recover the 
instantiating lambda captures. However, there was a mismatch in how we compared 
the pattern declarations of lambdas: the constraint instantiation used a 
tailored `getPatternFunctionDecl()` which is localized in SemaLambda that finds 
the very primal template declaration of a lambda, while 
`FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern` finds the latest template 
pattern of a lambda. This difference causes issues when lambdas are nested, as 
we always want the primary template declaration.

This corrects that by moving `Sema::addInstantiatedCapturesToScope` from 
SemaConcept to SemaLambda, allowing it to use the localized version of 
`getPatternFunctionDecl`.

It is also worth exploring to coalesce the implementation of 
`getPatternFunctionDecl` with `FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern`. 
But I’m leaving that for the future, as I’d like to backport this fix 
(ecc7e6ce4 made the issue more visible in clang 20, sorry!), and changing 
Sema’s ABI would not be suitable in that regards. Hence, no release note.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/133719

(I split up the commits to make the review easier. Also note that in #<!-- 
-->133719, Shafik and I discovered additional cases where clang behaves 
incorrectly. However, since those aren't regressions, their fixes aren't being 
considered at this time.)

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133863.diff


3 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp (-69) 
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp (+68) 
- (modified) clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp (+15) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
index e7e0b4cfb72a7..2d29af4258cd7 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp
@@ -702,75 +702,6 @@ bool Sema::CheckConstraintSatisfaction(const Expr 
*ConstraintExpr,
       .isInvalid();
 }
 
-bool Sema::addInstantiatedCapturesToScope(
-    FunctionDecl *Function, const FunctionDecl *PatternDecl,
-    LocalInstantiationScope &Scope,
-    const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs) {
-  const auto *LambdaClass = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Function)->getParent();
-  const auto *LambdaPattern = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(PatternDecl)->getParent();
-
-  unsigned Instantiated = 0;
-
-  // FIXME: This is a workaround for not having deferred lambda body
-  // instantiation.
-  // When transforming a lambda's body, if we encounter another call to a
-  // nested lambda that contains a constraint expression, we add all of the
-  // outer lambda's instantiated captures to the current instantiation scope to
-  // facilitate constraint evaluation. However, these captures don't appear in
-  // the CXXRecordDecl until after the lambda expression is rebuilt, so we
-  // pull them out from the corresponding LSI.
-  LambdaScopeInfo *InstantiatingScope = nullptr;
-  if (LambdaPattern->capture_size() && !LambdaClass->capture_size()) {
-    for (FunctionScopeInfo *Scope : llvm::reverse(FunctionScopes)) {
-      auto *LSI = dyn_cast<LambdaScopeInfo>(Scope);
-      if (!LSI ||
-          LSI->CallOperator->getTemplateInstantiationPattern() != PatternDecl)
-        continue;
-      InstantiatingScope = LSI;
-      break;
-    }
-    assert(InstantiatingScope);
-  }
-
-  auto AddSingleCapture = [&](const ValueDecl *CapturedPattern,
-                              unsigned Index) {
-    ValueDecl *CapturedVar =
-        InstantiatingScope ? InstantiatingScope->Captures[Index].getVariable()
-                           : LambdaClass->getCapture(Index)->getCapturedVar();
-    assert(CapturedVar->isInitCapture());
-    Scope.InstantiatedLocal(CapturedPattern, CapturedVar);
-  };
-
-  for (const LambdaCapture &CapturePattern : LambdaPattern->captures()) {
-    if (!CapturePattern.capturesVariable()) {
-      Instantiated++;
-      continue;
-    }
-    ValueDecl *CapturedPattern = CapturePattern.getCapturedVar();
-
-    if (!CapturedPattern->isInitCapture()) {
-      Instantiated++;
-      continue;
-    }
-
-    if (!CapturedPattern->isParameterPack()) {
-      AddSingleCapture(CapturedPattern, Instantiated++);
-    } else {
-      Scope.MakeInstantiatedLocalArgPack(CapturedPattern);
-      SmallVector<UnexpandedParameterPack, 2> Unexpanded;
-      SemaRef.collectUnexpandedParameterPacks(
-          dyn_cast<VarDecl>(CapturedPattern)->getInit(), Unexpanded);
-      auto NumArgumentsInExpansion =
-          getNumArgumentsInExpansionFromUnexpanded(Unexpanded, TemplateArgs);
-      if (!NumArgumentsInExpansion)
-        continue;
-      for (unsigned Arg = 0; Arg < *NumArgumentsInExpansion; ++Arg)
-        AddSingleCapture(CapturedPattern, Instantiated++);
-    }
-  }
-  return false;
-}
-
 bool Sema::SetupConstraintScope(
     FunctionDecl *FD, std::optional<ArrayRef<TemplateArgument>> TemplateArgs,
     const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &MLTAL,
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
index 292406f886362..6f114b71981fa 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
@@ -2412,6 +2412,74 @@ static FunctionDecl *getPatternFunctionDecl(FunctionDecl 
*FD) {
   return FTD->getTemplatedDecl();
 }
 
+bool Sema::addInstantiatedCapturesToScope(
+    FunctionDecl *Function, const FunctionDecl *PatternDecl,
+    LocalInstantiationScope &Scope,
+    const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs) {
+  const auto *LambdaClass = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Function)->getParent();
+  const auto *LambdaPattern = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(PatternDecl)->getParent();
+
+  unsigned Instantiated = 0;
+
+  // FIXME: This is a workaround for not having deferred lambda body
+  // instantiation.
+  // When transforming a lambda's body, if we encounter another call to a
+  // nested lambda that contains a constraint expression, we add all of the
+  // outer lambda's instantiated captures to the current instantiation scope to
+  // facilitate constraint evaluation. However, these captures don't appear in
+  // the CXXRecordDecl until after the lambda expression is rebuilt, so we
+  // pull them out from the corresponding LSI.
+  LambdaScopeInfo *InstantiatingScope = nullptr;
+  if (LambdaPattern->capture_size() && !LambdaClass->capture_size()) {
+    for (FunctionScopeInfo *Scope : llvm::reverse(FunctionScopes)) {
+      auto *LSI = dyn_cast<LambdaScopeInfo>(Scope);
+      if (!LSI || getPatternFunctionDecl(LSI->CallOperator) != PatternDecl)
+        continue;
+      InstantiatingScope = LSI;
+      break;
+    }
+    assert(InstantiatingScope);
+  }
+
+  auto AddSingleCapture = [&](const ValueDecl *CapturedPattern,
+                              unsigned Index) {
+    ValueDecl *CapturedVar =
+        InstantiatingScope ? InstantiatingScope->Captures[Index].getVariable()
+                           : LambdaClass->getCapture(Index)->getCapturedVar();
+    assert(CapturedVar->isInitCapture());
+    Scope.InstantiatedLocal(CapturedPattern, CapturedVar);
+  };
+
+  for (const LambdaCapture &CapturePattern : LambdaPattern->captures()) {
+    if (!CapturePattern.capturesVariable()) {
+      Instantiated++;
+      continue;
+    }
+    ValueDecl *CapturedPattern = CapturePattern.getCapturedVar();
+
+    if (!CapturedPattern->isInitCapture()) {
+      Instantiated++;
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    if (!CapturedPattern->isParameterPack()) {
+      AddSingleCapture(CapturedPattern, Instantiated++);
+    } else {
+      Scope.MakeInstantiatedLocalArgPack(CapturedPattern);
+      SmallVector<UnexpandedParameterPack, 2> Unexpanded;
+      SemaRef.collectUnexpandedParameterPacks(
+          dyn_cast<VarDecl>(CapturedPattern)->getInit(), Unexpanded);
+      auto NumArgumentsInExpansion =
+          getNumArgumentsInExpansionFromUnexpanded(Unexpanded, TemplateArgs);
+      if (!NumArgumentsInExpansion)
+        continue;
+      for (unsigned Arg = 0; Arg < *NumArgumentsInExpansion; ++Arg)
+        AddSingleCapture(CapturedPattern, Instantiated++);
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
 Sema::LambdaScopeForCallOperatorInstantiationRAII::
     LambdaScopeForCallOperatorInstantiationRAII(
         Sema &SemaRef, FunctionDecl *FD, MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList MLTAL,
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp 
b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp
index dcb09c76d26b6..1f67c2511e096 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp
@@ -325,3 +325,18 @@ template <class> void f() {
 template void f<int>();
 
 }
+
+namespace GH133719 {
+
+template <class T>
+constexpr auto f{[] (auto arg) {
+  return [a{arg}] {
+      [] () requires true {}();
+  };
+}};
+
+void foo() {
+  f<int>(0);
+}
+
+}

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133863
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to