================
@@ -13462,13 +13462,114 @@ static ElaboratedTypeKeyword
getCommonTypeKeyword(const T *X, const T *Y) {
: ElaboratedTypeKeyword::None;
}
+static NestedNameSpecifier *getCommonNNS(ASTContext &Ctx,
+ NestedNameSpecifier *X,
+ NestedNameSpecifier *Y, bool IsSame) {
+ if (X == Y)
+ return X;
+
+ NestedNameSpecifier *Canon = Ctx.getCanonicalNestedNameSpecifier(X);
+ if (Canon != Ctx.getCanonicalNestedNameSpecifier(Y)) {
+ assert(!IsSame && "Should be the same NestedNameSpecifier");
+ return nullptr;
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
But in any case, users should expect a null NNS, since that is not a missing
NNS, it is a valid NNS.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131964
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
