bcardosolopes wrote:

@Andres-Salamanca thanks for working on this. We usually write tests that 
exercise any possible different paths codegen can take. For next rounds: it's 
fine if you add less things in one go and make it more incremental with the use 
of (a) errorNYI and (b) assert on missing features.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134333
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to