uecker wrote: > > Once that is settled, then go back to work on redeclaration/definition > support. Possibly it'd be good to pause and ask the standards body to clarify > how it's supposed to work first. While I think my proposed semantics above > make sense, the standard doesn't actually _specify_ that, one way or the > other. And it should.
For standard attributes, the standard explicitly makes it clear that redeclarations w/ and w/o attributes are ok and can be mixed. This is also what GCC implements. I do not think there is anything unclear in the standard. Each attribute has specific wording that clarifies this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132939 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
