https://github.com/DavidSpickett commented:
I see that this would be breaking for code unintentionally relying on the features being omitted, but it makes sense to fix it nevertheless. I would have expected us to add the features all along. What does gcc/binutils do in this scenario? I don't think it would change the decision here, but curious anyway. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134366 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
