zeule wrote: Of course it is only because of the Qt popularity I submit this changeset to the mainline.
The keywords are natural delimiters in those declarations, so I can't see the proposed solution to use them as delimiters to be unsuitable to an any significant group of Qt users. In the defense of the generic approach I want to remind that Qt's moc expands macros, thus one can replace the standard keywords (and, I guess, the "Q_PROPERTY" itself) with anything else. I can try to use contexts in the implementation, but I still oppose targeting `Q_PROPERTY` literal in the source code. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131605 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
