pawosm-arm wrote:

> I guessing we pass `-lm` twice here to work around `ld.bfd` not handling 
> static libraries in a pleasant way?

This is all due to the way libamath incremetnally emerged into its present 
existence. And yes, static linking added another layer of problems here.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133578
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to