================
@@ -57,22 +58,37 @@ void main(unsigned GI : SV_GroupIndex) {
// CHECK: define void @main()
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// Verify destructor is emitted
-// NOINLINE-NEXT: call void @_GLOBAL__sub_I_GlobalDestructors.hlsl()
-// NOINLINE-NEXT: %0 = call i32 @llvm.dx.flattened.thread.id.in.group()
-// NOINLINE-NEXT: call void @_Z4mainj(i32 %0)
-// NOINLINE-NEXT: call void @_GLOBAL__D_a()
-// NOINLINE-NEXT: ret void
+// NOINLINE-DXIL-NEXT: call void @_GLOBAL__sub_I_GlobalDestructors.hlsl()
+// NOINLINE-DXIL-NEXT: %0 = call i32 @llvm.dx.flattened.thread.id.in.group()
+// NOINLINE-DXIL-NEXT: call void @_Z4mainj(i32 %0)
+// NOINLINE-DXIL-NEXT: call void @_GLOBAL__D_a()
+// NOINLINE-DXIL-NEXT: ret void
+
+// NOINLINE-SPIRV-NEXT: %0 = call token
@llvm.experimental.convergence.entry()
+// NOINLINE-SPIRV-NEXT: call spir_func void
@_GLOBAL__sub_I_GlobalDestructors.hlsl() [ "convergencectrl"(token %0) ]
----------------
Keenuts wrote:
Yes it does. If it didn't, LLVM would complain there there is a mix of
controlled and un-controlled convergence (hence why I noticed I had to fix this
:) )
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133469
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
