GeorgeKA wrote: > We do tend to offer newer features into older standards when that isn't a > burden, as long as we have a warning advertising the incompatibility with the > current standard, as we do. > > What is the motivation for this change?
It was originally detailed in [125913](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/125913#issue-2833762681). The motivation from the reporter was simply that the feature is being allowed in C++17 mode when it's documented as a C++20 feature. >From your response, sounds like it being allowed is okay. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133597 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
