================
@@ -6404,20 +6404,23 @@ def warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width: Warning<
def err_bitfield_too_wide : Error<
"%select{bit-field %1|anonymous bit-field}0 is too wide (%2 bits)">;
def warn_bitfield_too_small_for_enum : Warning<
- "bit-field %0 is not wide enough to store all enumerators of %1">,
+ "bit-field %0 is not wide enough to store all enumerators of
%select{|preferred type }1%2">,
InGroup<BitFieldEnumConversion>, DefaultIgnore;
def note_widen_bitfield : Note<
"widen this field to %0 bits to store all values of %1">;
def warn_unsigned_bitfield_assigned_signed_enum : Warning<
- "assigning value of signed enum type %1 to unsigned bit-field %0; "
+ "assigning value of %select{|preferred }1signed enum type %2 to unsigned
bit-field %0; "
"negative enumerators of enum %1 will be converted to positive values">,
InGroup<BitFieldEnumConversion>, DefaultIgnore;
def warn_signed_bitfield_enum_conversion : Warning<
"signed bit-field %0 needs an extra bit to represent the largest positive "
- "enumerators of %1">,
+ "enumerators of %select{|preferred type }1%2">,
InGroup<BitFieldEnumConversion>, DefaultIgnore;
----------------
ojhunt wrote:
@erichkeane @AaronBallman is there a way to make a specific usage of a
diagnostic an error rather than a warning? (rather than duplicating the
diagnostic)
Also is there a boot-strap build target? LLVM uses preferred_type bit fields
everywhere and while it would be nice to imagine there are no existing errors
I'd like to verify a rebuild does not break anything :D
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
