================
@@ -3482,15 +3486,40 @@ bool FunctionDecl::isDestroyingOperatorDelete() const {
// Within a class C, a single object deallocation function with signature
// (T, std::destroying_delete_t, <more params>)
// is a destroying operator delete.
- if (!isa<CXXMethodDecl>(this) || getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Delete ||
- getNumParams() < 2)
+ if (!isa<CXXMethodDecl>(this) || getOverloadedOperator() != OO_Delete)
+ return false;
+
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
> [@cor3ntin](https://github.com/cor3ntin) is it possible to convince C++ to
> allow new/delete to be a member function? (Otherwise I'm not sure how I can
> make a test that could ever hit this path)
Good point, NVM this comment then
<!-- Reviewable comment -OMDqhpX699Za4ZpuDiG:b-ddazod -->
<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113510
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
