spall wrote:

> For example, for `abs`, it still depends on the _HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY 
> availability attribute. Does this PR intend to keep abs overloads using half 
> "unexposed"? Or should that overload for abs be exposed too?

I'm not sure I understand the question, I think abs is the same as the ones in 
this PR are modified to be. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132804
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to