spall wrote: > For example, for `abs`, it still depends on the _HLSL_16BIT_AVAILABILITY > availability attribute. Does this PR intend to keep abs overloads using half > "unexposed"? Or should that overload for abs be exposed too?
I'm not sure I understand the question, I think abs is the same as the ones in this PR are modified to be. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits