mizvekov wrote: Regarding the double const , I think this is not a type printer bug per se.
By indiscriminately adding a qualifier to a type, we can produce a type which cannot be written, such as this const qualified array case. As such, we can never do a good job printing these anyway. There are two issues: * A single step desugaring with qualifier preservation could cause this. This could be produced as part of the type 'aka' in diagnostics. We probably should add a special case for arrays when single step desugaring. * When adding const for `constexpr` declarations, we could probably add some new kind of type sugar node which represents how this qualifier was added. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131649 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
