================
@@ -3856,6 +3856,59 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, AfterPPDirective) {
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::minusminus, TT_AfterPPDirective);
}
+TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UserDefinedConversionFunction) {
+ auto Tokens = annotate("operator int();");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 6u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::l_paren, TT_FunctionDeclarationLParen);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("explicit operator int *();");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 8u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[1], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::l_paren, TT_FunctionDeclarationLParen);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("operator int &();");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 7u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::amp, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::l_paren, TT_FunctionDeclarationLParen);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("operator auto() const { return 2; }");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::l_paren, TT_FunctionDeclarationLParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::kw_const, TT_TrailingAnnotation);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::l_brace, TT_FunctionLBrace);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("operator decltype(auto)() const;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 10u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[0], tok::kw_operator, TT_FunctionDeclarationName);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[2], tok::l_paren, TT_TypeDeclarationParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::r_paren, TT_TypeDeclarationParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::l_paren, TT_FunctionDeclarationLParen);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::kw_const, TT_TrailingAnnotation);
+
+ auto Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.TypeNames.push_back("Foo");
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
So the type for `operator Type()` needs to be in `TypeNames`? I think we can
detect that without that constraint, and that would be much nicer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131434
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
