offsetof wrote:
> I don't think this resolves the original issue.
> Part of the problem is that we are missing a diagnostic saying the implicit
> constructor is deleted (and why).
Fair enough; I linked that issue because the nonsensical diagnostic mentioned
there ("no viable conversion from `S` to `int`") is a side-effect of the bug
fixed by this PR. With the change applied, we get the usual "no matching
constructor" with a list of candidates. But if we want something else, then the
issue should remain open.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131320
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
