cor3ntin wrote:

> @cor3ntin I thought introducing a new Decl node only to ensure the invariance 
> of the protocol of TransformDecl() seemed a bit waste, but I don't know if 
> there's a better approach, so I left it as a draft.

This looks like a reasonable approach to me

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107995
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to