================
@@ -1273,6 +1273,168 @@ void
Sema::AddImplicitMSFunctionNoBuiltinAttr(FunctionDecl *FD) {
FD->addAttr(NoBuiltinAttr::CreateImplicit(Context, V.data(), V.size()));
}
+static bool typeListMatches(FunctionDecl *FD,
+ const clang::Sema::SymbolLabel &Label) {
+ assert(Label.TypeList.has_value());
+ if (FD->getNumParams() != Label.TypeList->size()) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // Check if arguments match.
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != FD->getNumParams(); ++i) {
+ const ParmVarDecl *PVD = FD->getParamDecl(i);
+ QualType ParmType = PVD->getOriginalType().getCanonicalType();
----------------
perry-ca wrote:
@efriedma-quic I've found a problem related to this comment. If I have a
pragma like:
```cpp
void fd6(int (*)()) {}
#pragma export (fd6(int (*)()))
```
I noticed that the type chain for the function arguments when I parse them on
the pragma has the ParenType. eg:
```
PointerType 0xc7957d5eeb0 'int (*)(void)'
`-ParenType 0xc7957d5ee80 'int (void)' sugar
`-FunctionProtoType 0xc7957d5eb90 'int (void)' cdecl
`-BuiltinType 0xc7957d2e570 'int'
```
This results in a type mismatch when I do the QualType compare in this code.
Any idea on how to solve this? Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111035
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
