================
@@ -131,17 +131,21 @@ def note_constexpr_past_end : Note<
"dereferenced pointer past the end of %select{|subobject of }0"
"%select{temporary|%2}1 is not a constant expression">;
def note_constexpr_past_end_subobject : Note<
- "cannot %select{access base class of|access derived class of|access field
of|"
- "access array element of|ERROR|"
- "access real component of|access imaginary component of}0 "
- "pointer past the end of object">;
+ "cannot %enum_select<AccessType>{"
+ "%BaseClassAccess{access base class of}|%DerivedClassAccess{access derived
class of}|"
+ "%FieldAccess{access field of}|%ArrayElementAccess{access array element
of}|"
+ "%ErrorAccess{ERROR}|"
+ "%RealComponentAccess{access real component
of}|%ImaginaryComponentAccess{access imaginary component of}"
+ "}0 pointer past the end of object">;
def note_non_null_attribute_failed : Note<
"null passed to a callee that requires a non-null argument">;
def note_constexpr_null_subobject : Note<
- "cannot %select{access base class of|access derived class of|access field
of|"
- "access array element of|perform pointer arithmetic on|"
- "access real component of|"
- "access imaginary component of}0 null pointer">;
+ "cannot %enum_select<NullSubobjectAccess>{"
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
> additionally
Or actually, maybe *instead* rather than *additionally*? I.e. don’t allow
`%enum_select<T>{...}` for the same `T` multiple times, but instead only allow
referencing an existing `enum_select` by writing e.g. just `%enum_select<T>0`
rather than `%enum_select<T>{...}0`. That would also save us from having to
check whether two definitions of an `enum_select` are actually the same.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130868
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
