aaron.ballman added a comment. > If I'm not mistaken the correct thing to do is to retroactively apply it to > C++11 even though it first appeared in the C++14 standard.
That is how we typically handle DRs. Do you also need to change the implementation of `EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait()` for the changes to `is_base_of()`? ================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:4083 case UTT_HasTrivialDestructor: case UTT_HasVirtualDestructor: + // C++14 [meta.unary.prop] ---------------- Is this correct for `has_virtual_destructor()`? LWG 2015 treats that the same as `is_empty()` and friends. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31637 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
