AmrDeveloper wrote:

> I have mixed feelings about this change. It mostly overlaps with what I am 
> working on, which is class `LexicalScope`, which has a bunch of the code for 
> handling the return value. I think I would prefer that this PR be dropped, as 
> the changes will be part of the PR I am working on.

Yes, I think in this case it's better to drop this PR

Thank you

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129933
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to