================
@@ -1,13 +1,21 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=c11 -std=c11 -pedantic %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=c23 -std=c23 -Wpre-c23-compat %s
// Check C99 6.8.5p3
void b1 (void) { for (void (*f) (void);;); }
-void b2 (void) { for (void f (void);;); } // expected-error {{non-variable
declaration in 'for' loop}}
-void b3 (void) { for (static int f;;); } // expected-error {{declaration of
non-local variable}}
-void b4 (void) { for (typedef int f;;); } // expected-error {{non-variable
declaration in 'for' loop}}
+void b2 (void) { for (void f (void);;); } /* c11-warning {{non-variable
declaration in 'for' loop is a C23 extension}}
----------------
shafik wrote:
I think these test should have show the non-local variables being used within
the loops as well. Otherwise the tests are not fully testing the functionality
and are not fully protecting against regressions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129737
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
