dpaoliello wrote:

Thanks for the info!

For the different terminators, I'd prefer to keep to my current "assume 1-byte" 
trick: the implementation is simple, and it will reduce the amount of unwind 
data we need to emit.

But for the "too many unwind codes" and "too far from the end" scenarios, it 
sounds like we'll be able to use chaining to work around them.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129142
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to