shafik wrote: > > It seems like for gcc at least, IIUC, `cc` does a bit more than `c` so > > while we are supporting `cc` for compatibility we are not fully supporting > > it? Specifically: > > `except try harder to print it with no punctuation` > > Perhaps we should document that in the comment in `Stmt.cpp`, for gcc > > comparability but not totally equivalent? > > In our testing, Clang's `c` was already trying harder than GCC's `c` and in > all the example we tried Clang's `c` matched GCC's `cc`. Do you know of any > case where Clang's `c` is not equivalent to GCC's `cc`?
If that is the case then I think we are good. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127719 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
